[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why 1981 Goldbergs better than 1955?

To: F_MINOR@email.rutgers.edu
Subject: Why 1981 Goldbergs better than 1955?
From: Juozas Rimas <JuozasRimas@TAKAS.LT>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 23:30:20 +0200
Delivered-to: F_MINOR@EMAIL.RUTGERS.EDU
References: <38A9C615.67639EDB.0068647A@netscape.net>
Reply-to: Juozas Rimas <JuozasRimas@TAKAS.LT>
Sender: "Mailing list devoted to the discussion of Glenn Gould's work and life." <F_MINOR@email.rutgers.edu>

A quote from a recent mesage:

"I  agree totally  with  prof. Poli  of  Milan  who  rates  the  Gould's
Bagatelles  as  equal  to  the  1981  Goldberg  recording  "

Is it the common opinion that 1981 goldbergs are better than 1955?

Juozas Rimas Jr
http://mp3.com/JuozasRimas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why 1981 Goldbergs better than 1955?
  - From: Pablo Fagoaga <faguss@yahoo.com>

References:
- Bagatelles - Right On !
  - From: Michael Sarna <DMSPhoto@netscape.net>

Prev by Date: Bagatelles - Right On !
Next by Date: Re: Why 1981 Goldbergs better than 1955?
Previous by thread: Bagatelles - Right On !
Next by thread: Re: Why 1981 Goldbergs better than 1955?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread